mirror of
https://github.com/Nanaloveyuki/BitLogger.git
synced 2026-05-30 15:42:25 +00:00
73 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
73 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: split-by-level
|
|
group: api
|
|
category: sink
|
|
update-time: 20260520
|
|
description: Create a split sink that routes records by minimum enabled level.
|
|
key-word:
|
|
- sink
|
|
- split
|
|
- level
|
|
- public
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Split-by-level
|
|
|
|
Create a split sink that routes records to one of two sinks based on whether the record level is enabled at a given minimum level.
|
|
|
|
### Interface
|
|
|
|
```moonbit
|
|
pub fn[A, B] split_by_level(
|
|
left : A,
|
|
right : B,
|
|
min_level~ : Level = Level::Warn,
|
|
) -> SplitSink[A, B] {
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### input
|
|
|
|
- `left : A` - Sink receiving records at or above `min_level`.
|
|
- `right : B` - Sink receiving records below `min_level`.
|
|
- `min_level : Level` - Threshold used for routing.
|
|
|
|
#### output
|
|
|
|
- `SplitSink[A, B]` - Level-based routing sink.
|
|
|
|
### Explanation
|
|
|
|
Detailed rules explaining key parameters and behaviors
|
|
|
|
- This is a convenience wrapper over `split_sink(...)`.
|
|
- High-severity and low-severity records can be separated without writing the predicate manually.
|
|
- It is useful for patterns such as warnings/errors to one destination and info/debug to another.
|
|
|
|
### How to Use
|
|
|
|
Here are some specific examples provided.
|
|
|
|
#### When Need Severity-based Routing
|
|
|
|
When warnings and errors should go to a special path:
|
|
```moonbit
|
|
let sink = split_by_level(callback_sink(fn(rec) {
|
|
println(rec.message)
|
|
}), console_sink(), min_level=Level::Warn)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In this example, `WARN` and above go to the left sink.
|
|
|
|
### Error Case
|
|
|
|
e.g.:
|
|
- If routing should use target, message, or fields instead of level, use `split_sink(...)` with a custom predicate.
|
|
|
|
- Sink-specific write behavior still follows the wrapped sinks.
|
|
|
|
### Notes
|
|
|
|
1. This is a convenience routing helper for a common policy.
|
|
|
|
2. It preserves the same one-side-only routing model as `split_sink(...)`.
|